OPENPROOF LEGAL · LAWYERS & LEGAL TEAMS
Who decided, who had which information, and which consequences are documented? OpenProof Legal is being developed to connect actors, decisions and sources, compare explanations and prepare a clear case for professional review.
Compare plans →No account needed to explore and compare. Restricted pilot; purchases are not open.
01 / START WITH THE CASE
Without a precise reference, a summary leaves the reader searching again. The proposed control links the claim to its original passage. The fictional three-cofounder case lets you examine that connection between claims and case sources.
When accounts differ, an early conclusion can hide what is missing. The proposed control preserves disagreement and the unresolved question until human review.
The next reader needs to distinguish sourced material, uncertainty and review decisions. The RPO format and public examples expose that structure without validating the legal merits.
02 / A CASE TO EXAMINE
Two founders blame the third for spending, lost customers and disruption. The fictional case explores how the actors interact: who could commit spending, who had to approve it, and who knew about the risk and when? Shared decisions and conflicting evidence inform the causal hypotheses to test.
These observations were written manually. This example does not demonstrate automatic contradiction detection. It takes no personal documents and provides no legal advice.
Explore the three-cofounder case →Explore the people, sources and timeline, then examine the claims, causation and report preparation. The excerpts and questions in this example are prepared in advance.
03 / AVAILABILITY AND LIMITS
| Status | Scope |
|---|---|
| Accessible without an account | Presentation, pricing comparison and fictional examples. No personal document upload in those examples. |
| Early-adopter access · in testing | Access for authorised identities. Acceptance of the real-case workflow must be completed before commercial opening. |
| Not open | Purchases, public subscriptions and external self-service registration. Email and Apple paths are under separate technical review; they are not open. |
Each result requires human review. OpenProof does not decide questions of law or responsibility. The professional reviews the sources and remains responsible for decisions.
04 / DESIGN AND RESPONSIBILITIES
TruthX founder and OpenProof designer Gersende Ryard de Parcey connects her transformation experience with decision traceability. Her design choices focus on retrievable sources, responsibilities, explicit reservations and human review.
The GREYC and Université de Caen Normandie contributions remain presented on the research page. The prototype delivered by Lucy Martin and Clément Correia-Peltier under Professor Gaël Dias’s supervision is a research foundation, not evidence of full product integration.
Founder and research team →