Skip to programme
GersendeMY PERSONAL WORLD

Regain control · THE FACTS. THE PEOPLE. YOUR DECISIONS.

Find your way forward.Regain control.

You reread conflicting documents and can no longer explain your story. Group each party’s passages around the same facts, reconstruct events and prepare your next conversation with a clear, verifiable brief.

Written introduction, no account needed · Full pilot by invitation.

My personal universeGersende Ryard de Parcey in black tailoring and heels against a pink and blue backdrop
YOUR STORY, MADE CLEAR. YOUR NEXT STEP, PREPARED.

Facts to find your bearings. A method to prepare your decisions.

WHEN A SITUATION TAKES UP TOO MUCH SPACE

Make sense of it.So you can move forward.

  • The documents keep growing, but the story is still hard to explain.
  • Accounts conflict and you want to know what is actually documented.
  • A conversation or decision is approaching. You want to arrive with a clear file.

Small-business owners, consultants, independent professionals, lawyers and small firms facing disagreement, broken trust or decisions under pressure.

THE TRANSFORMATION · WHAT YOU LEARN TO DO

From scattered documents to a verifiable story.

BEFORE

Documents keep accumulating. Each party has a different account. You reread them, but struggle to explain what happened.

Start with a fact to clarify. Bring together the email, court-claim and interview passages about it. Then reconstruct events without losing contradictions or evidence unfavourable to you.

  1. You find the thread.

    Four fact sheets bring together relevant passages from each party. Each event keeps its date, actors and references.

  2. You see what holds up and what is missing.

    Distinguish documented agreement, an actor’s account, contradiction and hypothesis. Questions become specific document requests.

  3. You arrive with a usable file.

    A two-page brief and a three-minute explanation to prepare a meeting, compare options and choose your next action.

AFTER · A FILLED EXCERPT

WRITTEN DEMONSTRATION · FICTIONAL CASE

Who had approved the order?

A filled excerpt from the fictional Rivage file. One question brings together accounts in the court claim, interview and emails.

  1. Alex’s account.

    He says Camille approved the full €24,000 service. The court claim repeats this assertion.

    S05 · S19, §1
  2. What Camille actually wrote.

    “Up to 15,000 euros.” Above that: a reduced quote and joint approval.

    S04
  3. Keep the uncomfortable detail.

    In her interview, Camille acknowledges agreement in principle up to €15,000. You cannot therefore write that she had accepted nothing.

    S20, §1
  4. The proportionate observation.

    Accounts disagree on the scope of approval. Joint approval of the full quote is not supplied: this is the document to seek.

    S02 · S03 · S04 · S05 · S19 · S20

Fictional texts created for the course. This comparison produces an observation and a question; it establishes neither fraud nor legal liability.

THE RESULT TO BUILD

A story you can explain and have checked, with opposing accounts grouped around the same facts.

THE METHOD’S STRENGTH

Why comparing accounts by fact is effective.

One fact, every account.

See side by side what each document says. Repetition across documents does not become independent confirmation.

A story that can be checked.

Each sentence points to a passage. Event dates and account dates stay separate, so contradictions can be examined instead of smoothed away.

Questions that move things forward.

A gap leads to a precise request. Alternative explanations stay open until a document can help distinguish them.

ONE METHOD · THREE STAGES

Find. Compare. Prepare.

An optional introduction and eight missions in three stages. Each mission produces part of your file.

01INCLUDED STAGE

Find the thread.

Find who says what about the same fact.

  • Your documents and the other party’s grouped by fact
  • A timeline separating events from later accounts
  • Visible agreements, disagreements and missing documents
Explore the missions
03INCLUDED STAGE

Prepare the next step.

Go into your next conversation with a usable file.

  • A story explained in two pages and three minutes
  • Specific document requests directed to the right people
  • Three options and a next action supported by facts
Explore the missions

Try the first comparison: two accounts of the same order, relevant passages and an observation you can check.

Start the first lesson

WITH GERSENDE · THE UNIVERSE

Connect the facts. Understand what is at stake.

I have led, advised and transformed organisations. My experience has led me to work on sources, the relationships between people and how to make a situation understandable.

With Regain control, I share a method you can practise: organise documents, keep contradictions visible and prepare options. Your judgement stays at the centre.

Explore my story

A WRITTEN COURSE · TWO FICTIONAL CASES

Read. Practise. Do it again.

An optional introduction and eight written missions using one fictional file: emails, invoice, bank statement, court claim and interview record. Group passages around the same facts, compare accounts, then write a decision brief. A second case lets you check whether you can repeat the method.

YOUR PACE

An optional 20-minute introduction, then eight missions. Around six hours including guided practice, self-paced; estimate to be tested during the pilot.

YOUR TOOLS

A computer and text editor are enough. No OpenProof subscription or AI assistant required. Begin with an entirely fictional case.

IN EACH MISSION

A lesson, a written demonstration, an exercise, a quiz, a correction and help if you get stuck.

Explore the introduction and eight missions
  1. 01

    One fact, two accounts, one observation

    Compare the two accounts of the order and the passages that allow you to examine them.

    20 min
    estimated with practice
  2. 02

    The decision that guides your file

    Choose the decision to prepare and the facts relevant to the next conversation.

    30 min
    estimated with practice
  3. 03

    Both parties’ passages grouped by fact

    Keep originals and create four sheets bringing together relevant passages from every account.

    40 min
    estimated with practice
  4. 04

    A dated story without filled-in gaps

    Reconstruct events and link later accounts to the same facts, keeping uncertainty visible.

    45 min
    estimated with practice
  5. 05

    Contradictions you can demonstrate

    Compare each party’s claims with supporting, contrary and missing passages.

    45 min
    estimated with practice
  6. 06

    Who decides, acts and can answer

    Link each role to a fact and document, then direct requests to someone who may be able to answer.

    40 min
    estimated with practice
  7. 07

    Explanations tested against the same facts

    Compare alternative explanations, their limits and the document that might distinguish them.

    40 min
    estimated with practice
  8. 08

    Three options and a precise next step

    Compare three options using the same facts and prepare a document request before deciding.

    40 min
    estimated with practice
  9. 09

    Your story in two pages and three minutes

    Present a verifiable story, its contradictions and the next decision, then repeat the method on a second case.

    50 min
    estimated with practice

A METHOD TO USE AGAIN

Explain your file. Repeat the process.

Your final result

A two-page brief and a three-minute explanation, supported by four fact sheets comparing accounts, a timeline, a document index and a role map. A reader must be able to find each passage, distinguish a claim from an observation, see what is missing and understand your next action. Repeat with the second case; quizzes do not replace this check.

Progress retains your responses and self-assessment. It certifies neither competence nor legal validity. Complete the entire programme through reading and written practice at your own pace.

Start the first lesson

THE METHOD · WITH OR WITHOUT OPENPROOF

Learn the method. Choose your tools.

The same course in both options. Use your usual tools, or OpenProof to connect your facts, documents and actors.

THE COURSE ON ITS OWN

Regain control

€190 including tax

One-time purchase · Self-paced

The introduction and eight missions, exercises, corrections and templates. Practise with your usual tools; no OpenProof subscription required.

No individual meetings or personal corrections.

COURSE INCLUDED AT NO EXTRA COST

OpenProof Pro + Regain control

€99 excluding tax / month

12-month commitment · €1,188 excluding tax in total

The method to structure your file. OpenProof to put it into practice: connect documents, reconstruct the timeline and examine the actors’ relationships.

The standalone course priced at €190 including tax is included in this option at no extra cost.

Fictional three-cofounder case with prepared excerpts and analyses. A demonstration of the result, not an automatic analysis of your file.

Pricing presented for launch. Purchases remain closed; the full course is available by pilot invitation. Software access follows the OpenProof Pro subscription terms.

A PUBLIC ACCOUNT · A STARTING POINT FOR THE METHOD

When a story needs reconstructing.

Nicolas Desjouis publicly describes the time spent reconstructing his story. This statement raises a methodological question: how can facts, documents and limitations be connected to explain a situation? We draw no conclusion about his dispute. You will practise on Rivage Services and a second consulting case, both entirely fictional.

Public post by Nicolas Desjouis ↗ · Text consulted on 2026-10-03

Before you begin.

What will I be able to do at the end?

Your final result: a two-page brief and a three-minute explanation, supported by four fact sheets comparing accounts, a timeline, a document index and a role map. A reader must be able to find each passage, distinguish a claim from an observation, see what is missing and understand your next action. Repeat with the second case; quizzes do not replace this check.

Why group by fact rather than by person?

The same order may appear in an email, court claim and interview. Putting them in one fact sheet lets you compare passages, identify changes and keep disagreements. You get a checkable story instead of rereading separate files.

Must I have experienced a crisis?

No. Apply the method to a specific difficult situation: disagreement, unclear commitment, scattered material or a decision to prepare.

Will the course determine who is right?

It teaches examination of sources, contradictions and options. Legal conclusions and advice on real commitments require the relevant professional.

Do I need OpenProof or AI?

No. Templates are sufficient. AI is optional and responses need checking. The course alone grants no software case-file access.

How does the launch work?

Explore the written introduction in open access, without an account. A named invitation is required to save exercises and follow all eight pilot missions. Sales will start after the observed pilot and agreed terms. No audio or video content is required.For launch notifications, select Regain control in the Universe form.

Regain control

Your next step starts with a first observation.

Explore the first lesson in open access, without an account. At launch: €190 including tax as a one-time purchase, or included with OpenProof Pro. The full course remains an invitation pilot; purchases are not yet open.

Start the first lesson